The impact of the Digital Age in Moral Judgments
نویسندگان
چکیده
Nowadays, several of the situations in which we have to make decisions are in digital form. In a first experiment (N=1010) we showed that people’s moral judgments depend on the Digital Context (Smartphone vs. PC) in which a dilemma is presented, becoming more utilitarian (vs. deontological) when using Smartphones. To provide additional evidence, we ran a second (N=250) and a third experiment (N=300), where we introduced time constraints and we manipulated time instructions. Our results provide an extended perspective on Dual-Process Models of Moral Judgment, as we showed that the use of smartphones, often assumed to be hurried which would be consistent with gut-feeling decision-making, increased the likelihood of utilitarian responses and decreased deontological ones. This is the first study to look at the impact of the digital age on moral judgments and the results presented have consequences for understanding moral choice in our increasingly virtualized world.
منابع مشابه
How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline
CContrary to expectations, ethics research has shown that, accountants earn low ethical reasoning scores in the moral development tests, due to accountants focusing on agreeableness trait. However, ethical tests evaluate agreeableness trait up to the intermediate levels of the moral development model. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between five personality traits a...
متن کاملPrinciples of Moral Judgment in Social Relations From the Perspective of the Koran and the Hadiths of the Ahl al-Beit
The present article deals with one of the most important and most affected issues in social relations. The arena of social life is a great field of judging the behaviors, traits, and motivations of others. The believers in God ought to do their best to judge justly and truthfully in this arena. Therefore, we need valid principles and criteria for correct moral judgments so that, by observing th...
متن کاملتأثیر تعدیلکننده قضاوتهای اخلاقی مدیران بر رابطه بین مشارکت در بودجهبندی و نارسایی بودجه در شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران
در تجزیهوتحلیل مباحث بودجهبندی، بهدلیل اینکه مدیران بخشهای مختلفشرکت به عمل نزدیکتر هستند و اطلاعات بهتریدارند، میتوانند به شیوههای متعددی بر معیارهای سنجش عملکرد خودشان تأثیر بگذارند. هدف اصلی پژوهش، تعیین این موضوع است که در چه شرایطی مدیران واحدهایتجاری از قضاوتهای اخلاقی خودشان برای ارزیابی ایجاد نارسایی دربودجه، بطور مثبت ویا منفی استفاده میکنند. در این پژوهش، تأثیر سه معیار ار...
متن کاملبررسی آموزهی اثر دوگانه و نقش قصد در قضاوت اخلاقی
Ethical research and theories assign great importance to the role of intention in passing moral judgments about individuals’ actions. The doctrine of double effect is among ethical disciplines that differentiate between controversial medical situations such as end of life care or abortion, and intentional, premeditated damage, in that they consider the former impermissible and the latter permis...
متن کاملThe Causal Role of Right Frontopolar Cortex in Moral Judgment, Negative Emotion Induction, and Executive Control
Introduction: Converging evidence suggests that both emotional and cognitive processes are critically involved in moral judgment, and may be mediated by discrete parts of the prefrontal cortex. The current study aimed at investigating the mediatory effect of right Frontopolar Cortex (rFPC) on the way that emotions affect moral judgments. Methods: Six adult patients affected by rFPC and 10 hea...
متن کامل